Sponsored by- The #1 Flutter-powered AI app builder
Home/Top/Testing/coverage vs fake_async

coverage vs fake_async

A head-to-head of two Testing packages on pub.dev, by daily downloads, GitHub activity, and maintenance.

coverage leads on usage with about 1.6x the daily downloads of fake_async (370,954 vs 237,203 per day). fake_async answers issues faster, a median first reply of 0 vs 4 days.

coverage

🇺🇸 tools.dart.dev · v1.15.1

Coverage data manipulation and formatting

Downloads / day
370,954
Stars
112
Likes
132
Pub points
115

Replies within ~1 week

fake_async

🇺🇸 dart.dev · v1.3.3

Fake asynchronous events such as timers and microtasks for deterministic testing.

Downloads / day
237,203
Stars
533
Likes
122
Pub points
150

Replies within ~2 days

coverage vs fake_async, metric by metric

Metric coverage fake_async
Downloads / day 370,954 237,203
Rank in Testing #2 #5
GitHub stars 112 533
Likes 132 122
Pub points 115 / 160 150 / 160
Issue response (median) 4 days 0 days
Contributors 99 99
Last commit 22 days ago 22 days ago
CI Yes Yes
License BSD-3-Clause APACHE-2.0
First published 12 years ago 12 years ago
Platforms android, ios, windows, linux, macos android, ios, windows, linux, macos, web

Highlighted cell wins each comparable metric. For rank, issue response, and last commit, lower is better.

More Testing comparisons