Sponsored by- The #1 Flutter-powered AI app builder
Home/Top/Testing/coverage vs fake_async

coverage vs fake_async

A head-to-head of two Testing packages on pub.dev, by daily downloads, GitHub activity, and maintenance.

coverage edges fake_async on usage, roughly 39% more daily downloads (418,820 vs 300,490 per day). fake_async answers issues faster, a median first reply of 0 vs 4 days.

coverage

🇺🇸 tools.dart.dev · v1.15.1

Coverage data manipulation and formatting

Downloads / day
418,820
Stars
115
Likes
132
Pub points
115

Replies within ~1 week

fake_async

🇺🇸 dart.dev · v1.3.3

Fake asynchronous events such as timers and microtasks for deterministic testing.

Downloads / day
300,490
Stars
536
Likes
123
Pub points
150

Replies within ~2 days

coverage vs fake_async, metric by metric

Metric coverage fake_async
Downloads / day 418,820 300,490
Rank in Testing #2 #6
GitHub stars 115 536
Likes 132 123
Pub points 115 / 160 150 / 160
Issue response (median) 4 days 0 days
Contributors 99 99
Last commit 20 days ago 20 days ago
CI Yes Yes
License BSD-3-Clause APACHE-2.0
First published 12 years ago 12 years ago
Platforms android, ios, windows, linux, macos android, ios, windows, linux, macos, web

Highlighted cell wins each comparable metric. For rank, issue response, and last commit, lower is better.

More Testing comparisons