Sponsored by- The #1 Flutter-powered AI app builder
Home/Top/Testing/coverage vs fake_async

coverage vs fake_async

A head-to-head of two Testing packages on pub.dev, by daily downloads, GitHub activity, and maintenance.

coverage edges fake_async on usage, roughly 36% more daily downloads (248,629 vs 183,047 per day). fake_async has the larger GitHub following (529 vs 105 stars).

coverage

🇺🇸 tools.dart.dev · v1.15.0

Coverage data manipulation and formatting

Downloads / day
248,629
Stars
105
Likes
130
Pub points
115

Replies within ~2 days

fake_async

🇺🇸 dart.dev · v1.3.3

Fake asynchronous events such as timers and microtasks for deterministic testing.

Downloads / day
183,047
Stars
529
Likes
119
Pub points
150

Replies within ~2 days

coverage vs fake_async, metric by metric

Metric coverage fake_async
Downloads / day 248,629 183,047
Rank in Testing #3 #5
GitHub stars 105 529
Likes 130 119
Pub points 115 / 160 150 / 160
Issue response (median) 1 days 0 days
Contributors 99 99
Last commit 1 month ago 1 month ago
CI Yes Yes
License BSD-3-Clause APACHE-2.0
First published 12 years ago 11 years ago
Platforms android, ios, windows, linux, macos android, ios, windows, linux, macos, web

Highlighted cell wins each comparable metric. For rank, issue response, and last commit, lower is better.

More Testing comparisons